This dissertation deals with the phenomenology of death penalty as one of the delicate methods of protecting and preserving the social system. which causes numerous ethical and legal disputes. In this dissertation, the views of the convicted person will be analyzed before the death penalty, related to the wider and narrow context of social values and norms, as well as our perception of them. Such an analysis assumes the consideration of anthropological, sociocultural, biosocial, communicological and other aspects of the reception and perception of the death penalty of the convicted to death, in comparison with the accepted and defined social norms and values. Despite anthropological, inseparable life from death, several rhetorical questions arise: can a man of the 21st century, despite knowledge, cognitive reach, and available information technologies, remain immune to the effects of consciousness on mortality? Since the assumed answer is denied, the logical question arises: what kind of reaction then does it trigger? What does this mean in terms of social values? Is the "subjective truth" subordinated to the term "social truth", if the latter has its own meaning beyond the reach of the system in which it operates? Does circulus vitiosus occur, so that a man reconciled with a certainty of finesse always returns to the fundamental social values? Are those biologically "programmed" or are directly dependent on sociocultural and behavioral paradigms, or the theory of miles? All this points us to a holistic approach in finding answers to these questions, because through the development of civilization man has developed instruments of "the social being" and accepted a whole series of postulates.