Objectives: The aim of the research is to examine whether there is a difference in the surgical techniques of PRK, LASIK and ICL for: short-term visual outcome after 6 months, long-term visual outcome after 24 months, procedure safety and remaining refractive error. Study Design: Historical (retrospective) cohort study. Participants and methods: The research was conducted on patients with myopia and astigmatism. Data was collected on the surgical technique performed binocularly: PRK, LASIK or ICL. Visual acuity was measured: before the procedure, 6 months after the procedure and 24 months after the procedure. Data were collected on the occurrence of complications and performed additional corrections. Results: The research was conducted on 150 patients. The median age was 33 years, with an interquartile range of 28 to 39 years. The visual outcome was satisfactory in all three groups during two measurement periods after 6 months and after 24 months after the procedures. Complications in this study occurred in 13 patients (8,7 %), mostly from the LASIK group, which has 11 patients with complications. The suboptimal refractive result that was corrected by additional correction amounts 1,3 % meaning only 2 of patients who, due to suboptimal refractive error, again underwent the correction procedure. Conclusion: Short-term and long-term visual outcome after binocularly performed PRK, LASIK and ICL showed success in all groups. In the study, ICL and PRK showed the highest safety of the procedure and the lowest number of complications, while LASIK had more frequent complications in this study. A suboptimal refractive result rarely occurs and can be corrected by additional correction in cases that require it.